hamco

Druze igrali smo protiv osakacenog Liverpula kojeg bi ozbiljnija ekipa dobila 3 razlike. Pristup u produzecima je sramotan, napravio je od nas luzere i to usadjuje u igrace. Sto kaze Wisey, vec ne na kraju utakmice birao izvodjace penala. SRAMOTA

Jarell Quansah (21) Harvey Elliott (20) Conor Bradley (20) Bobby Clark (19) James McConnell (19) Jayden Danns (18) To su djeca koja su dominirala citav produzetak. To su djeca koja su nas osramotila a posebno tvog ljubimca Pochetina koji je javno na pressu posle meca izjavio da je isao na penale.

Jebo me sav svijet ako Jackson nije bolji igrac od ovog? Sta je danas uradio osim sto je fulo mrtvi zicer? Decko je setac i presing sa njim je misaona imenica, frajer hoda i dzogira. Jebem ja takvog igraca taman da je licno Messi.

Jel dobio otkaz jebem mu umrle?

Pokrij se po usima, u produzetku Pochetino se povukao kao da zivot ovisi protiv djecurlije i to citavih 30 minuta. Jel te sramota braniti ga nakon tog kukavicluka koji je priredio danas? Ljudi su igrali sa C timom, sa anonimusima kojima ne znam ime izgovoriti i povlaci se i igra bunker i ceka penale. Pa jebem ti fudbal i onog ko te naucio da je takav pristup dobar.

On bi i u Harkovu dao sebi for ispred ruskog vojnika i metak bi ga pogodio u po cela. Sve bi se to odvilo prvom prilikom.

Covjek je jedini nas igrac sa mudima i sa konkretnim potezom. Napravio je 3 zicera, 2 Galagheru i na kraju onaj karambol.

relo molim te banuj svakog ko pruzi bilo kakvu vrstu podrske Pochetinu. Znaci to je klasicno pranje mozga nama i ostalim normalnim ljudima. Ovaj je zavrsio sto se mene tice, gotovo. Nema trunke podrske i ide bojkot na max. Picko jedna luzerska, ovo odavno nije vidjeno. Whisperu, cobinhu, ko god da ga pohvali, poserem vam se u usta svima. Ludi ste i coravi ako ovo govno budete branili i pruzali mu podrsku.

Ja ocekujem drugo poluvrijeme da budemo bolji. Prevelik je ovo dan i pritisak za mlade momke. Sterling i Chilwell moraju pogurati ovu ekipu, nikako obratno. Nkunku bi trebao makar u 60-65 minuti uci ako ostane 0:0. Steta za ponisten gol koji je mozda i regularan, ali i Caicedo je trebao fasovati mozda crveni. U drugom moramo ici po gol, a i nase izmjene bi morale napraviti vecu razliku u odnosu na Liverpulovu.

To sto je iskren i ne zeli da mu se neko mjesa u izbor igraca na terenu ne moze biti nikako losa osobina, naprotiv. Tuchel nije trener u rangu Kloppa i Guardiole, ali je za ove nase pulene posle njega Johan Cruyf.

Ko da je Nunez neki igrac... Salah i Arnold su hendikep. Al realno ko ih jebe, fale i nama prvotimci, James, Silva i Nnkunku(nije fit 100%). Moramo ovo dobiti, nema opravdanja.

Zbog cega je radio los posao? Sto nije osvojio LS vec dosao do finala? Sto nije osvajao ligu sa 110 bodova? Ajd mi molim te objasni sto je to radio los posao u PSGu?

Pa zato sto su dvostruki arsini. Tuchel kakav god da je je svjetlosnim godinama ispred Pottera, Lamparda i tako tih trenera. Ceka se svaki moguci kiks Tuchela da ga se popljuje. Gdje je Tuchel radio jos los posao?

Zato Potteru necemo pripisati ni jedan poraz.

Did you know Chelsea's 2009/10 squad had seven players captaining their National Team. Terry - England Ballack - Germany Drogba - Ivory Coast Ivanović - Serbia Carvalho - Portugal Essien - Ghana Čech - Czech Republic A sad imamo Chilwella...

Ne moze biti njegova krivica sto druga ekipa obara rekorde po broju bodova. Pa Leverkuzen ima vise bodova nego Bayern ikada, vise imaju bodova nego Bayern pod vodstvom Guardiole, Ancelotija, Flicka i drugih. Tuchel jeste zaredao neocekivane poraze, ispao u kupu od nizeligasa, ukratko ne radi dobar i ocekivan posao, ali ne moze on biti krivac sto druga ekipa igra iznad svih ocekivanja.

Bravo za makar malo postova i analiza. Uspio sam malo pokrenuti prozivkama. Ja bih volio da vidim istu postavu kao protiv Citya. Jackson mi je pod must da igra. On iako mnogo masi, apsolutno je aktivan u napadu i ucestvuje u svemu. Igra bez lopte mu je takodjer veoma dobra i uz Galaghera igrac koji odradi najveci presing i broj sprinteva tokom utakmice. Nkunku jos nije 100% fit i njegovo setkanje protiv Citya zadnjih 35 minuta me je razocaralo. Ocekujem mnogo vise od Chilwella, uz Sterlinga je najiskuniji igrac i on mora da se trgne, mora pokazati zasto je prvi bek ekipe. Ovo sto igra ove sezone je pretanko, pa Gusto s druge strane koji je 2003 godiste igra mnogo bolje od njega. Sto se tice samo igre u polju, zelim vidjeti prije svega visok intenzitet sa mnogo presinga i borbu za 50:50 duele. Trebamo teziti sto vecem mogucem posjedu lopte, Wembley ima veci teren od Anfielda i bice lakse rjesavati njihov presing. Za one koji nisu znali, Anfield je 101m dug i sirok 68 dok je Wembley 105m i 70m. https://www.huck-net.co.uk/news/2023-05/premier-league-pitch-sizes/ Sto se tice kvalitete ja uopste ne smatram da je Liverpul toliko jaci, prosla utakmica je anomalija i vjerujem da cemo ovaj put biti drasticno bolji. Nadam se samo da se nasi mladi momci nece usrati a pogotovo to mislim na odbranu i golmana. Ovo je utakmica u kojoj nije bitna ljepota u igri nego rezultat. Ako nisu sigurni u pas bolje je izbij na tribine nego pokusavati rizicni pas u svojih 16m. Sto se tice izmjena, neovisno o rezultatu one moraju biti hrabre i logicne, ne zatvarati se bespotrebno nego kao protiv Citya nego pokusati dotuci protivnika ako imas sansu. Prekidi nam mogu biti problem, Liverpul ima veoma visoke igrace i ne smijemo sebi dozvoliti jeftin gol iz prekida. Na kraju, nadam se da ce sudija biti fer i da nece odluciti mec svojim glupostima ni na jednu stranu. Neka bolji pobjedi.

Bane mi je u top 5 najdrazih igraca koji su nosili dres ovog kluba. Drogba, Terry, Hazard, Kante i Ivanovic. Lampard je 6. Ne mogu mu halalit prelazak u City. Mislim i biti 6. u ovakvoj konkurenciji je uspjeh.

Mozda je citava nasa sezone skriptovana, mozda je Poch novi Johan Cruyf ali mu je naredjeno da ne smijemo biti bolje plasirani

Pa mi se ljudi ne smijemo plasirati u Evropu ukoliko ne zelimo da nas dostigne FFP. Evo clanak od The Atletic: Qualifying for the Europa Conference League and returning to UEFA’s financial jurisdiction would lower the maximum amount Chelsea could lose by £36.5m, while increasing the amortised cost of their transfer spending in the summer of 2023 by £21.5m. That is a significant financial squeeze just to take part in a competition that earned West Ham around £16m as winners last season. Is it worth it? Summary: • ⁠Winning on Sunday would qualify Chelsea to the UECL • ⁠Currently, the club are only required to comply with the Premier League’s PSR rules. They narrowly did so — for 2022-2023, and insist they intend to remain on the right side of the rules for 2023-24. • ⁠Many outside Chelsea, including respected football finance analyst Swiss Ramble, are convinced significant player sales will be required before June 30 to meet that objective. • ⁠Returning to UEFA competition would mean needing to comply with UEFA’s club licensing and financial sustainability regulations (FSR), the rules that replaced financial fair play (FFP) in the summer of 2022. • ⁠These are considerably more restrictive than the Premier League’s PSR requirements. Clubs are permitted to lose up to €80m (£68.5m; $86m) for the 2024-25 monitoring period — which will encompass the 2022-23 and 2023-24 seasons. • ⁠That means £68.5m over the previous two years, not £105m over the previous three years, becomes the key loss threshold for Chelsea next season if they do succeed in winning the Carabao Cup and qualifying for the Europa Conference League next season. • ⁠Chelsea’s players are likely to have bonuses written into their contracts that are tied to European qualification, which will increase the club’s overall salary cost. These will be offset by incentives in the club’s commercial agreements with kit manufacturer Nike and shirt sponsor Infinite Athlete that are linked to playing in UEFA competition, as well as the relatively modest TV and matchday revenue garnered from a Europa Conference League campaign. • ⁠The biggest impact is the amortisation, both PL and UEFA capped amortisation time at 5 years. This only came into effect this January for the PL but it’s been active since Summer 2023 for UEFA clubs • ⁠Meaning the £400m spent on players in that window are subject to the 5 year cap under UEFA rules. • ⁠“In the case of Moises Caicedo (who signed an eight-year contract with Chelsea) his £100m transfer fee counts as £12.5m annually for PSR but, in UEFA’s calculations, it will need to be £100m divided by five. So it will count as £20m per year.” • ⁠Chelsea signed 10 players on greater than 5 year contracts in summer 2023. The Athletic estimates the amortised cost of these arrivals as £59.4m under PL rules, or £80.9m under UEFA. A significant increase • ⁠Milan struck a deal to take a voluntary one year ban from UEFA competitions. And this may be the best case scenario for Chelsea if they win on Sunday. • ⁠In his most recent analysis of Chelsea’s finances in August 2023, Swiss Ramble projected that the club is on course to post a £201m loss for the Premier League’s period ending with 2023-24, well above the £105m allowable loss limit for PSR. • ⁠On the UEFA front, he estimated a €159m (£136m) loss, also far over the €80m maximum acceptable deviation. • ⁠Both of these projections were made before Chelsea committed around £67m in transfer fees to acquire Deivid Washington, Djordje Petrovic and Cole Palmer in the final days of the summer transfer window. • ⁠“Could they increase their commercial income? Yes, but the main deals can’t be improved upon. “There’s relatively little wiggle room on the commercial side, so you have to look at (player) asset trading before June 30.” • ⁠Other clubs will be aware of this and knowing that we need to sell to comply with the rules will look to take advantage and get a discount. Everton sold early with Richarlison and felt they were forced to lower his price (but managed to comply with rules) whereas Nottingham Forest held out for a higher price for Brennan Johnson (but could face a points deduction as a result of it) • ⁠The Athletic has been told by the Premier League and UEFA that clubs can choose to wait until July 31, the deadline imposed by Companies House, to file their year-end accounts, thereby giving themselves an extra month to sell players. • ⁠It is not clear why Forest elected not to do this when trying to wrangle a higher fee out of Tottenham for Johnson, but it is one of several options open to Boehly and Clearlake as they attempt to remain true to their pledge to keep Chelsea compliant with all of football’s financial sustainability rules.

Slazem se sa Whisperom. Jedan od top 3 trenera koji su vodili ovaj klub. Na sve to bio u klubu kad je klub bio u najvecem sranju kada nas umali nisu ugasili.

Posto nema teme(jebem narod), evo ovdje: Ako im ovo nije dodatni motiv, treba uvesti kazne.

Zar nije bilo lakse kupiti Brighton umjesto Chelsea?

Niko Kovac: 8 losses in 65 games (12.3%) Hansi Flick: 8 losses in 86 games (9.3%) Julian Nagelsmann: 10 losses in 84 games (11.9%) Thomas Tuchel: 11 losses in 44 games (25.0%) ONE OUT OF 4 GAMES LOST

Zapravo to sam i mislio, nije problem sto su izasla krila nego sto nije umjesto krila uveo krilo. Opet kazem, mogu shvatiti da ne Chalobuh uveo, ali nije poslije mora Casadeia i totalno izolovati Nkunka. Ne vidim nista lose u tome sto je presao na 5 nazad zadnjih 20 minuta. Problem je sto je to bilo 5-4-1 a ne 5-3-2. Kako god, da sam se ja pitao ne bih uvodio Chalobuh vec bi krilo, ali kazem da mogu shvatiti taj potez.